However, over land, where there is not very much moist convection, which is not dominated by the tropics and where one expects surface trends to be greater than for the oceans, there was no amplification at all! Over the oceans where most tropical moist convection occurs, the amplification in the model is greater – about a factor of 1.4. In the global mean, the ratio was 1.25 as expected and completely in line with the results from other models. Interestingly, there was a significant difference between the three ratios. describing the calculation as follows:įirst I calculated the land-only, ocean-only and global mean temperatures and MSU-LT values for 5 ensemble members, then I looked at the trends in each of these timeseries and calculated the ratios. Schmidt’s 2009 realclimate article also reported that the overall GISS ER amplification factor was 1.25 and, over ocean, was 1.4. Schmidt waxed eloquently against the Klotzbach et al article for being “heavily promoted”, containing “fundamental flaws” and wasting “a huge amount of everyone’s time” – a criticism that one feels would be more aptly directed at (say) Mann et al 2008, which “heavily promoted” their supposedly groundbreaking no-dendro reconstruction using upside-down and contaminated Tiljander sediment, with a “huge amount of everyone’s time” being wasted in dealing with the seemingly wilful obtuseness of both Schmidt and Mann in failing to retract or amend the original article and realclimate posts. (The realclimate post was published just before Climategate and not previously discussed here.) Schmidt linked to a November 2009 realclimate post, “Muddying the Peer Reviewed Literature”, which criticized Klotzbach et al 2009 for using an amplification factor of 1.2 over both land and ocean in their similar downscaling of satellite trends to surface for comparison to surface trends. The one thing and the only thing Lebron has on him is longevity, but if you're playing that game, then KAJ is currently the GOAT.A few days ago, in a comment at CA, NASA blogger Gavin Schmidt stated that, over land, the ratio of lower troposphere trends to surface trends in the GISS ER model was 0.95 (+- 0.07) and thus there was no downscaling over land of tropospheric trends. A championship dedicated to Kobe? That makes him the GOAT? wow.ĥ. Lebron winning the one to tie it is irrelevant.Ĥ. Lakers v Celtics total championships has nothing to do with Lebron winning one in purple and gold.
Even in their down years, they were still one of the most popular franchises in all sports.ģ. The whole #WashedKing thing was brought up by him and only him to use as motivation for himself.Ģ.
#Get excel statpad for mac series#
Michael Jordan's exaggerated legacy has been dismantled.ĬubanLinx wrote:2016 - Down 3-1 Against the 73-9 Warriors and the Defending Champs, All the Odds was stacked against LBJ, he only had 1 Legit All Star teammate and no Hall Of Famers, The series was supposedly over, then the Unthinkable happened the Prodigal Son of Cleveland has given them their first Major Sports title in over 50 years.ġ. This kind of storylines only happens in Movies.
And most importantly Won a Championship dedicated to Kobe Tied Boston's record for the most Championships and who knows what's gonna happen in the next Few Years Led the league in assists for the first time in his career That was the Uppercut to the GOAT debate.Now the Knockout Punch that will end it allĢ020 - LBJ was supposedly Washed Up his Prime was supposedly over, The Clippers was supposedly the clearcut Champs, The Lakers was supposedly a Dead Franchise and Kawhi was supposedly the best player in the world he was the King of LA and again the odds was stacked against LBJ.
2016 - Down 3-1 Against the 73-9 Warriors and the Defending Champs, All the Odds was stacked against LBJ, he only had 1 Legit All Star teammate and no Hall Of Famers, The series was supposedly over, then the Unthinkable happened the Prodigal Son of Cleveland has given them their first Major Sports title in over 50 years.
0 kommentar(er)
